The bill indicated "age appropriate" sex education based on medically accurate information should be taught in kindergarten through high school. The first page mandated that pupils whose parents objected not be required to take any sex ed and it required school districts to emphasize abstinence as an effective means of preventing unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. The bill did not hand down curriculum to school districts, mandating kindergartners learn about sex.
"It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls."
Are we Republicans not above this? How can we demand better of our counterparts, when we use scare tactics as they do?
RandomnessRocks
Kindergardeners should have no idea what sex is.
And I don't trust a man who tells his little girls a story about "two princes falling in love"
JMB
Republicans may be above it, but the attention seeking children here are not. There is a difference.
lisa baby...
Thank you posting this question and its refreshing to me to see a republican who see's the truth!! Alot of the Mccain adds have been false or misleading.. its people who make those adds who make ur party look terrible ignorant and rude!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH0xzsogzAk
LovingLife
Wow... I'm almost speechless about you actually standing against this, given your party affiliation. Congratulations! And thanks for the observation. As a parent myself, I see no harm in wanting to teach kindergartners age appropriate sex ed. It's done at home, true, but reinforcing it at school can't hurt.
Senator Bush W. McCain
Obama's stance on this issue - and every issue - is very different from the stance of Senator Larry Craig and Senator John McCain
You might also like:
Orignal From: Obama's stance on sex-ed for children?
No comments:
Post a Comment